Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to the Monroe County Surrogate’s Court to take proof and make a determination in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: There is no proof in this record nor is there any determination made upon the subject of whether it is practicable or possible to administer the gift in accordance with the expressed intent of the testator. (See Saltsman v. Greene, 256 N. Y. 636; Teele v. Bishop of Derry, 168 Mass. 341.) In order that a full determination can be made of the matters in controversy, a development of the essential relevant facts is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teele v. Bishop of DerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Saltsman v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. In re the Accounting of Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Accounting of Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API