Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Burger
I agree with the Court’s opinion insofar as it holds that the availability of backpay is a matter which Title VII commits to the sound equitable discretion of the trial court. I cannot agree with the Court’s application of that principle in this case, or with its method of reviewing the District Court’s findings regarding Albemarle’s testing policy.
*450With respect to the backpay issue, it must be emphasized that Albemarle was not held liable for practicing overt racial discrimination. It is undisputed that it voluntarily discontinued such practices prior to the effective date of Title VII and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- 5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 587, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8460 United States of America v. Georgia Power Company, Charles King v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Second National Bank v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
- Greve v. Cincinnati Traction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1913