Legal Opinion
Grigerik v. Sharpe
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 1997No. AC 15099PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHEA, J.
The defendants, Gary Sharpe and Angus McDonald-Gary Sharpe and Associates, Inc., have appealed from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff, Joseph Grigerik, damages for breach of a contract to perform soil and percolation tests and to design a site plan and septic system for unimproved land of the plaintiff and also for the defendants’ negligence in performing the contract. As grounds for reversing the judgment, the defendants claim that (1) the plaintiff, who is not a party to the contract, fails to qualify for the status of a third party beneficiary *777entit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Stowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grigerik v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
- Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. John Fitch Court Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Grigerik v. SharpeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Micci v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.