Legal Opinion
Borak v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 1, 1948No. 46772PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Judge.
This is a suit for salary in the amount of $7,038.43, which represents the amount which the plaintiff would have received as United States Naturalization Examiner in the Department of Justice, for the period from January 19, 1942, to June 7, 1944.
Plaintiff was summarily dismissed from service in January 1942, and was not reinstated until he obtained a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia on June 5, 1944, which so directed. Borak v. Biddle, 78 U.S.App. D.'C. 374, 141 F.2d 278.
After the plaintiff’s summary dismissal in January of 1942,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Borak v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Whiting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Gadsden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Daniel S. Urbina v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Edward Saffron v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.