Legal Opinion

People v. Campble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court improperly closed the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover police officer who purchased crack-cocaine from the defendant. The sole witness at the Hinton hearing (see, People v Hinton, 31 NY2d 71, cert denied 410 US 911) was the undercover officer, who testified that he was assigned to the Brooklyn South Narcotics unit, and was previously assigned to the Brooklyn South TNT unit. He continued to work undercover in the area covered by the Brooklyn South Narcotics unit. He further testified that he had "open cases” involving subjects who had been arrested but not yet…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. ParrishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API