Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hudson

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 4969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Action under the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Plaintiff seeks recovery of overtime pay from defendant for a period from May 1961 to September 1963, plus an amount equal to the alleged overtime due for liquidated damages and for reasonable attorney’s fees to be allowed by the Court.

Plaintiff was employed from May 1961 until September 14, 1963, by defendant who operates a large photographic business which is in interstate commerce. Defendant raises no issue as to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
Bogash v. Baltimore Cigarette Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
Richter v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
Wells v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
Vogelpohl v. Lane Drug Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Alaska International Industries, Inc. v. MusarraAlaska Supreme Court · 1979