Bohannan v. Underwood
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellant, Pamela Bohannan, admitted liability in this automobile collision case. The only issue tried to the jury was damages. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee Carol Underwood for $51,140. We affirm.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial because appellee testified that she was no longer financially able to see her doctor. Appellant argues that evidence of one’s pecuniary condition is highly prejudicial and should never be heard by a jury unless it is directly relevant to some issue in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Foster v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Matter of Estate of TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.