Legal Opinion
Access Living of Metro. Chi. v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided December 17, 2018No. 16 CV 9690PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Manish S. Shah, United States District Judge *1147Plaintiffs are people with disabilities who use motorized wheelchairs and Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago, a non-profit organization that advocates for people with disabilities. They claim Uber is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. , by not providing people who use motorized wheelchairs with access to its services that is equal to the access it provides to people who do not. Uber moves to dismiss the complaint based on a lack of standing or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings.
I. Legal…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Access Living of Metropolitan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Access Living of Metropolitan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Access Living of Metropolitan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Equal Rights Center v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Fuog v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.