Legal Opinion

People v. Kyllingstad

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1978No. Crim. 30149PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of second degree burglaiy (Pen. Code, § 459) and was sentenced to state prison. On appeal he raises issues concerning the voluntariness of his confession, the trial court’s ruling that he could be impeached with prior convictions for burglary and attempted burglary, inadequate assistance of counsel, and instructional error.

Facts

Since the sufficiency of the evidence is conceded, the facts may be briefly stated.

Some time between 9 a.m. and noon on September 14, 1976, the home of Valerie and John Werlich was burglarized. Entry had apparently been made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. PostenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. BailesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. LassellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API