Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

'Appeal from Linn District Gourt. — Hon. F. O. Ellison, Judge. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The Central Park line is one of defendant’s street railways in Cedar Eapids. The plaintiff, with his wife, child, and sister-in-law boarded a car at Fifth Street and First Avenue with the purpose of riding to E Avenue and Sixteenth Street, the end >of the line, near which he resided. He paid the fares of himself and those with him, but it does not appear how much this was. Hpon reaching Sixteenth street, the car stopped, and plaintiff, noticing the motorman swinging the trolley around, asked if the car was going no farther, and was • informed that such was the order of the conductor. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Curtis v. Sioux City & Highland Park Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Coine v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. TuttleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lee v. KirbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API