Legal Opinion

Holland v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 21, 1998No. 1320974PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of trespassing in violation of Code § 18.2-119. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in failing to suppress a barment notice issued under a policy authorizing police officers to act as agents for the manager of a public housing complex. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I

In June 1995, the management of Loudoun House, a federally-subsidized apartment complex, devised a strategy to curb criminal activity and trespassing. The property manager executed a power of attorney appointing as her agents all members of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. County Board of Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. City of Winchester v. RedmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Daniel v. City of TampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Williams v. NagelIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Chesapeake v. Gardner Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. O'Banion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  2. Keith Osborne Collins v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  3. Hicks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  4. Hicks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  5. O'Bannion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API