Holland v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of trespassing in violation of Code § 18.2-119. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in failing to suppress a barment notice issued under a policy authorizing police officers to act as agents for the manager of a public housing complex. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I
In June 1995, the management of Loudoun House, a federally-subsidized apartment complex, devised a strategy to curb criminal activity and trespassing. The property manager executed a power of attorney appointing as her agents all members of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. County Board of Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- City of Winchester v. RedmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Daniel v. City of TampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. NagelIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Chesapeake v. Gardner Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'Banion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Keith Osborne Collins v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Hicks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Hicks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- O'Bannion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.