Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1922No. 23882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is an action for damages. Plaintiff claims that defendant’s locomotive set fire to the dry grass upon its track and right of way, which spread to his field and destroyed his buildings, etc. On the main issue, to wit, the liability vel non of the defendant, the question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment below in favor of plaintiff.

I

Two witnesses, William Sly and McKinley Sly, testify that they saw the fire immediately after the locomotive passed, and saw that it started on the track; they were about 400 yards from the spot. Waites Harper also saw the fire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lemann Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. V. & A. Meyer & Co. v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  3. Luikart v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. MoityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Tidewater Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API