Legal Opinion

Gold v. DiCarlo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1965No. 901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

380 U.S. 520 (1965)

GOLD ET AL.

v.

DICARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

No. 901.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 26, 1965.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Jesse Moss for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

2Per curiam

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. G & M Employment Service, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. People v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. Concert Connection, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API