Legal Opinion

Tison v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 22, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Accusation of adultery. Before Judge Park. City court of Sylvester. January 1, 1906.

1Opinion of the Court

Eish, O. J.

1. Upon tile trial of one charged with the offense of adultery, it is necessary, in order to authorize a conviction, to prove by competent evidence that, at the time of the alleged offense, both the accused and the other person alleged to have participated in the criminal act were'married persons. Kendrick v. State, 100 Ga. 360.

2. The testimony of a witness, that the man with whom the accused was alleged to have committed the offense “claims to be a married man,” *8was merely hearsay, and such evidence has no probative value. See Equitable Mortgage Co. v. Watson, 119 Ga. 283, and cit.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Equitable Mortgage Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Kendrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rea v. PursleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API