Legal Opinion

McAlpine v. Gilpatrick

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 7, 1939No. 3048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

If the mother is not an unfit custodian, she is entitled to the custody, by force of the statute (P. L., c. 290, s. 4). Leclerc v. Leclerc, 85 N. H. 121, 125; Brown v. Jewell, 86 N. H. 190; Sheehy v. Sheehy, 88 N. H. 223, 228. The court has found the mother’s fitness, but the defendants’ brief alleges an offer of evidence tending to show her unfitness. It is not shown by the record, and it is not clear, whether this evidence was excluded. Assuming its exclusion, the exclusion was proper if it was offered only to show that the child’s welfare would be better subserved by the defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. SheehySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. Leclerc v. LeclercSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Barclay v. Dublin Lake ClubSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Brown v. JewellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McLaughlin v. MullinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API