Legal Opinion

Martin v. Union Mutual Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1895No. 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. ~W. H. Pritci-iard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

This action was brought to recover the *276amount stipulated in a certain insurance policy issued by the defendant upon the life of the husband of the plaintiff. The payment of the claim was resisted upon two grounds, (1) that the husband of the plaintiff was not dead, and (2) that no proofs of his death had been furnished the company as required by the terms of the policy. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment rendered thereon this appeal has been prosecuted.

After plaintiff had introduced her evidence and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bromley v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Martin v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Estate of Kustel, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API