Martin v. Union Mutual Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. ~W. H. Pritci-iard, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, C. J.
This action was brought to recover the *276amount stipulated in a certain insurance policy issued by the defendant upon the life of the husband of the plaintiff. The payment of the claim was resisted upon two grounds, (1) that the husband of the plaintiff was not dead, and (2) that no proofs of his death had been furnished the company as required by the terms of the policy. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment rendered thereon this appeal has been prosecuted.
After plaintiff had introduced her evidence and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bromley v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Martin v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Estate of Kustel, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1884