Legal Opinion

Fluellen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1933No. 22923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGuekry, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of burglary, and assigns error on the overruling of his motion for a new trial. ■ The only special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges that counsel for the defendant “was given no time to make an investigation of the case or prepare for the defense.” Counsel for the plaintiff in error relies upon the case of McArver v. State, 114 Ga. 514 (40 S. E. 779). The case at bar is easily differentiated from the McArver case, in that in that case, while there was no formal motion for a continuance, counsel for the defendant did “ask for sufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zipperer v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. McArver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Hunt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beavers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API