Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1916No. 1061PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

We adopt the following statement from appellants’ brief, which we regard as sufficient statement of the case:

“T. A. Morrison and T. J. Coggin, as partners, sue the Texas & Pacific Railway Company and the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company, as common carriers owning connecting lines of railroad, to recover about $2,197.50 as damages alleged to have been by them sustained as a result of injuries caused by the alleged careless and negligent handling and delays in transporting about 300 head of Mexico steers from El Paso to Plainview, Tex. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. HelmTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API