Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Allen v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1942No. 14011Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBell, Justice

1. The Code, § 81-1104, declares: “It is error for any judge of a superior court, in any case, whether civil or criminal or in equity, during its progress, or in his charge to the jury, to express or .intimate his opinion as to what has or has not been proved, or as to the guilt of the accused; and should any judge of said court violate the provisions of this section, such violation shall be held by the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals to be error, and the decision in such case reversed, and a new trial granted in the court below, with such direction as the said Supreme Court or Court of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API