Legal Opinion
Herren v. Shelnutt
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1926No. 7 Div. 252Published
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The summons and complaint named S. W. Herren and Wheeler Barker as individuals and as partners doing business under the firm names of Herren & Barker and Barker & Herren, and claimed against the individuals and against the two partnerships. Herren filed a special plea, denying the partnership. Issue being joined, the jury, after hearing the evidence, returned 'a verdict as follows:
“We, the jury, find the issue in favor of the plaintiff and against S. W. Herren as an individual, and against the partnership of Herren & Barker and Barker & Herren, and assess the damages at the sum of $274.25.”
Upo…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pacific Mut. L. Ins. v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Tennessee Valley Bank v. Valley View FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- General Accident, Fire & Life Ins. v. ShieldsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913