Legal Opinion

In the Interest of: R.D.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 2019No. ED107179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Castern District DIVISION FOUR IN THE INTEREST OF: ) No. ED107179 R.D.M. Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis ' Honorable Robin Ransom FILED: June 4, 2019 Introduction Ronald Mottley (‘Father’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights over R.D.M. (“Child”). In his sole point on appeal, Father argues that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because Father did not voluntarily or intentionally relinquish custody of or contact with Child. Because we find Father abandoned Child under Section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K.A.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. In the Interest of P.L.O.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. In the Interest of: J.P.B. M.R.S. v. Greene County Juvenile OfficeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. Katina Piatt v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. S.S.S. v. C.V.S.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of: A.M.R., R.H.H. III, and H.H. Juvenile Officer and Guardian Ad Litem v. J.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. In the Interest of: K.A.M.L.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. In the Matter of: M.N.V.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API