Legal Opinion

Amanda Wilder v. Frank Bisignano

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 13, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00842Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AMANDA WILDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:24-CV-842-ZMB ) FRANK BISIGNANO,1 ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Amanda Wilder brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Doc. 1 ¶¶ 3,5. Because the Commissioner made no legal error and his decision is supported by substantial evidence, the Court affirms the denial of benefits.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Marcus Hensley v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Moore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API