Legal Opinion

Bates v. Days

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 15, 1882Published

Motion to transfer the ease from this to a state court.

1Opinion of the Court

Krekel, D. J.

It appears that plaintiffs, being non-residents of the state of Missouri, sued out an attachment against the defendant, who is a resident of this state, and seized a stock of goods now in the hands of the United States marshal, who is proceeding to sell them under orders of this court. '

Soon after the seizure of the goods by the foreign creditors certain Missouri creditors of the defendant in the attachment sued out, in the local state court, writs of attachment, and are aiming under them to reach such of the proceeds as may not be necessary to satisfy the claims of the foreign…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. EmersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1839
  2. Garden City Manuf'g Co. v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1871
  3. Lehman v. BerdinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API