Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gamez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 10, 2006No. 1 CA-IC 05-0069Published

1Concurrence

BARKER, Judge,

Special Concurrence.

¶ 17 Under our current legislative scheme, an undocumented immigrant is not an “employee” for purposes of the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”). Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“AR.S.”) § 23-901(6)(b) (Supp.2005). For this reason, I agree that the award denying benefits should be affirmed.

¶ 18 This particular case can be resolved based on the conflict in medical testimony described above. However, the issue of whether undocumented immigrants are entitled to worker’s compensation benefits under the Act is presented by this case, has been fully briefed by the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API