Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Heiman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2014No. COA13-1339PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Heidi Venier, executrix of Peter Heiman’s estate, appeals from an order entered 28 June 2013 by the superior court affirming an order of the Orange County Clerk of Superior Court and concluding that Audrey Layden, Mr. Heiman’s wife, was entitled to an elective share of $25,970.35 from the estate. We reverse.

I. Background

Peter Heiman (“decedent”) passed away on 7 July 2009. Prior to his death, he had executed a will naming Heidi Venier, his only child, the sole beneficiary and executrix of his estate. Mr. Heiman was survived by his wife, Ms. Layden, and Ms. Venier, his daughter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Carcano v. JBSS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Harton v. HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. In Re Estate of PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weatherspoon Fam. LLC v. Hatteras Inv. Partners, L.P.North Carolina Business Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API