Hartman-Tyner, Inc. v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Department of Business & Professional Regulation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Petitioners, each of which is a pari-mu-tuel wagering permit holder licensed by respondent, the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Department of Business and Professional Regulation (“Division”), petition for review of an emergency rule adopted by the Division, which repeals Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-11.027.1 Petitioners argue that the Divi*561sion’s findings of an immediate danger to the public health, safety, or welfare, upon which emergency rule 61DER05-1 is based, are insufficient to justify emergency rulemaking pursuant to section 120.54(4), Florida Statutes (2005). Because we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Florida Home Builders Ass'n v. Division of LaborDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Little v. ColerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Florida Health Care v. Agency Health CareDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Florida Democratic Party v. HoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. Calder Race Course, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005