Legal Opinion

Stanley W. Rosenfield and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Trustees v. Kay Jewelry Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 16, 1968No. 9973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This case is a continuation of litigation between appellants as lessors and the appellee as lessee of certain commercial property located in downtown Oklahoma City. The principal issues of the controversy have been earlier considered and finalized by opinion of this court, Rosenfield v. Kay Jewelry, 384 F.2d 98, but we did then refuse to entertain and render an original decision upon a question of recovery of costs, undecided by the trial court, which was presented to us by agreement of the parties and a certification of the trial court. The question was remanded to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woods Construction Company, Inc., a Corporation, and American Casualty Co., of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. State of Utah George D. Fehr Earl E. Fehr Joe Lyon, Jr. And United Western Minerals Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. American Hawaiian Ventures, Inc. v. LatuharharyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
  5. Stanley W. Rosenfield and the First National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Trustees v. Kay Jewelry Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barbara BRAXTON, Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 788, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Auto Servi, Inc. v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  3. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Copperweld Steel Company, in No. 79-1799 v. Demag-Mannesmann-Bohler, Demag Stranggiess-Technik Gmbh, Demag Aktiengesellschaft, in No. 79-1800Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API