Legal Opinion
Bartels v. Rural Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 7, 2004No. 03-3393PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. Roy E Bartels, Debra Bartels, and the estate of Roy E Bartels appeal a judgment dismissing their amended complaint against Rural Mutual Insurance Company as time-barred. The Bartelses argue that because they timely amended their complaint and because the amended complaint relates back to the original complaint's filing, the trial court erred by concluding their claim against Rural was barred by the statute of limitations. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Background
¶ 2. For purposes of this appeal, the following facts alleged in the complaint are not in dispute. Roy was killed on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Korkow v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Rae v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Gaddis v. LaCrosse Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dakin v. MarciniakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Bergstrom v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Rabideau v. StillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Colborn v. Netflix IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.