Legal Opinion

Burdsal v. Shields

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1905No. 14,009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J.:

The sole question presented in

this proceeding is whether an action in forcible entry and detainer, or forcible detainer, tried by a jury before a justice of the peace, may be appealed by the defendant to the district court without a showing of the amount involved in such action. The district court dismissed such appeal because no showing of value was made. Section 120 of the code of civil procedure before justices (Gen. Stat. 1901, §5353) is as follows :

“In all cases not otherwise specially provided for by law, either party may appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spalding v. Bank of MuskingumOhio Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Nordmark v. NystromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hale v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API