Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tangle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1986No. 01346PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a direct appeal from a conviction for burglary and criminal attempt for which appellant received a sentence of four to eight years. We hold that the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to introduce rebuttal evidence of appellant’s prior record for burglary for the purpose of impeachment,1 and grant a new trial.

The facts may be summarized as follows. Arriving home at 9:30 P.M. on January 29, 1983, Samuel Opatich discovered that the window in the door of the rear entry to his home was broken. Opatich also noticed fresh blood dripping down the inside of the door to the floor.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DuffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. TangleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API