Legal Opinion

United States v. Oviedo-Villarman

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 25, 2003No. 01-2197PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Federico Villarman-Oviedo (“Villar-man”) brings this appeal to raise 16 different issues and errors that he claims necessitate either a new trial or reversal. We deny all of his claims of error, uphold the rulings of the district court and affirm his conviction and sentencing.

In a grand jury indictment returned on March 24, 1999, Villarman together with one or more of his 20 co-defendants were charged in five drug-related counts, including one count of conspiracy (1) to possess with intent to distribute and (2) to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, one…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. United States v. CasasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. GobbiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., Frank E. Corrente, and Richard E. AutielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. ShindermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. NascimentoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API