Legal Opinion

United States v. Esric Ricardo Lugg

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 2, 1990No. 88-3174PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Esric Ricardo Lugg (“Lugg” or “appellant”) appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He asserts that the District Court erred in refusing to compel the testimony of co-defendant witnesses called by the defense after those co-defendants had entered pleas of guilty. As we find that the District Court committed no reversible error in its rulings on the questions before us, we affirm the convictions for the reasons more fully set out below.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Bank One of Cleveland, N.A. v. AbbeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Simpson, Joseph B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API