Legal Opinion

Oberhausen v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 19, 2007No. Civil Action 3:07CV-198-HPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chief Judge.

One of life’s most trivial annoyances— the parking ticket — and one of our most fundamental constitutional protections— due process, form the unlikely nexus for Plaintiffs’ challenge to Metro Government’s enforcement of state and local parking regulations. The Court has devoted considerable effort considering these two at once without either inflating the significance of the former or trivializing the latter.

Plaintiffs focus their arguments on how Defendants’ enforcement policies have violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION v. THE TOWNSHIP OF ASTONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. D.A. Berger v. City of Philadelphia Bureau of Administrative AdjudicationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. Evans v. City of Ann ArborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  4. Louisville/ Jefferson County Metro Government v. Hon Olu A. Stevens, Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court, Division Six (6)Kentucky Supreme Court · 2021
  5. McCarthy v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API