Driscoll v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
After construction of the hotel building of the taxpayer had progressed to the point where a part of the air-conditioning system had been installed, for which fans, motors, and other material had been delivered, taxpayer concluded that some radical changes should be made in the plans and size of the building, and that the air-conditioning system was inadequate. Considerable work had been done and materials used which had to *494be tom out in making these changes, with the following consequences as aptly stated by the Tax Court: “As a result of, these changes the insulated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sneed v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Crabb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Commissioner v. SeeligsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sears Oil Co., Inc., on Review v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Hotel Sulgrave, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- California Casket Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Bailey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.