Legal Opinion
Owen v. Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1924No. 4275PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
On the 27th day of August, 1923, a preliminary injunction was granted in a suit instituted by the appellee for infringement of letters patent for a method of cementing oil wells. On March 3, 1924, the appellant was adjudged guilty of contempt for a violation of the injunction thus granted, and soon thereafter moved the court to dissolve the preliminary injunction, as interpreted and construed on the hearing of the contempt proceeding. The motion was denied, and the present appeal is prosecuted from the interlocutory order or decree refusing to dissolve the injunction.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Grain Separator Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- City of Chicago v. Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Wilson & Co. v. Best Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Wilson v. Byron Jackson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Security Metal Products Co. v. Kawneer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Treasure Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948