Alterman v. Home Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district, in favor of the plaintiff upon an agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
To recover for a conceded loss sustained by fire, the plaintiff sued under two insurance policies issued by the defendant company and covering “ the brick building and extension thereto occupied as store and dwelling, situate No. 529 Bast 11th Street, Borough of Manhattan, city of New York, including also all fixtures ; also stoops, sidewalks, mason and- iron work in front, fences and yard fixtures in rear thereof.”
There were two brick buildings on the lot, one four stories in height located on the front, and the other two stories in height located on the rear of the premises, the latter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pettit v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Rice v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
- Le Gendre v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Robinson v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Old Colony Ins. Co. v. HardawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Alterman v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921