Legal Opinion
State v. Finkle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 4, 1974PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N. J. Super. 199.
2ConcurrenceClieeobd, J.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeobd and Judge Col-lestee — 7.
For reversal — None.
3Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. FinkleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Stamato & Co., Inc. v. TP. OF VERNONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
4Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhynaughtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- State v. AbeskaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Stamato & Co., Inc. v. TP. OF VERNONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State v. CardoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State v. GunterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.