Legal Opinion
People v. Stewart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The record does not establish that the defendant was informed, prior to entering his plea, that his sentence would necessarily include a period of postrelease supervision. As the *582People concede, the plea must therefore be vacated (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586 [2008]; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777 [2008]; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Carni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BorregoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. EdmondsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010