Legal Opinion

Benson v. Vick

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1984No. Civ. 4320-A, 4320-BPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs sued the defendant as a result of an automobile accident. After a trial by jury, verdicts were returned in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, after the denial of their motions for a new trial by the trial court, appeal, contending that the amount of the verdicts and the resulting judgments were inadequate.

We find no error in the judgment of three of the plaintiffs but must reverse and remand the judgment of one of the plaintiffs.

Five separate plaintiffs, three of whom were occupants in the automobile involved in the accident, brought suit against the driver of the other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. MosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Feazell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Stone v. EcholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. McCain v. Redman Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Denton v. Foley Athletic ClubCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Posey v. McCrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Courtesy Ford Sales, Inc. v. HendrixCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Downs v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API