Simmons Co. v. Thaxton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannedl, Judge.
1. ■ The Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State, although in derogation of common law, is highly remedial and should be liberally construed to give effect to its beneficial purposes. U. S. Fidel. &c. Co. v. Maddox, 52 Ga. App. 416, 419 (183 SE 570); Wilson v. Maryland Cas. Co., 71 Ga. App. 184, 188 (30 SE2d 420).
2. “After an injury and as long as he claims compensation, the employee, if so requested by his employer, shall submit himself to examination, at reasonable times and places, by a duly qualified physician or surgeon designated and paid by the employer or the State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Zant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Parker v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977