Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Foxworth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2013PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

John J. Martucci, Jr. (“Appellant”), attorney for the plaintiff in the underlying *470action, appeals the trial court’s March 12, 2012 order. That order imposed a $1000.00 sanction for Appellant’s failure to appear at a scheduled Rule Returnable Hearing. We are constrained to reverse.

The facts and procedural history of the underlying case are immaterial to the disposition of this appeal. However, the events leading to the trial court’s March 12, 2012 order are relevant. The trial court summarized that background as follows:

The above captioned matter was initially scheduled for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Ricci v. GearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. MoodySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. DeboseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. K.W. v. S.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Com. v. Boyer, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behavioral Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Boyer, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behavioral Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API