Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Aaron O'Keefe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 22, 2006No. 05-11924PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Michael Aaron O’Keefe (“O’Keefe”) appeals his convictions for receipt, advertisement, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(c)(1)(A) and (d), and 2252(a)(2), (a)(4)(B), and (b)(1). O’Keefe argues that his convictions should be reversed because the government improperly used his post-arrest silence for impeachment purposes in violation of his Fifth Amendment right to due process under Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), and engaged in prosecutorial misconduct. For the reasons set forth below, we…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. GaniasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- State v. TullySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rafael Diddier GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.