Legal Opinion
Howard v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2008No. 96 M.D. 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge LEADBETTER.
Before us for disposition in our original jurisdiction are the preliminary objections of Respondents to the October 11, 2007 first amended petition for review, complaint in declaratory judgment and bill of equity (first amended petition for review) of pro se petitioner Antonio Howard challenging the constitutionality of certain 1995 amendments (Act 33) to the Juvenile Act of 1972 1 relating to the transfer of criminal matters from adult to juvenile court. “Commonwealth Respondents” include Governor Edward G. Rendell and Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Commonwealth Ass'n of School Administrators, Teamsters Local 502Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General Ex Rel. Corbett v. Richmond TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- C. Stedman v. Lancaster County Bd. of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- D. Young v. J. Wetzel & DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- J.P. Kollock, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bruce R. Beemer, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017