Read v. McLanahan
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal from order enjoining the defendants from interfering- with the property or assets of the late firm-. of Stotesbury, McLanahan & Co., and appointing a receiver thereof, &c., &c. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.—Freedmah, J.
Upon the motion below it appeared that the plaintiffs, on December 10, 1880, duly recovered a judgment against Henry H. Stotesbury, a member of the firm of Stotesbury, Mc-Lanahan & Co.; that oh December 23, 1880, an execution was duly issued thereon to the sheriff of the city and county of New York; that on the same day the said sheriff assumed to make a levy thereunder upon all the right, title and interest of the said Henry H. Stotesbury of, in, and to the property and business of the said firm ; that on January 13, 1881, the said sheriff sold at public auction,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walsh v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Smith v. . OrserNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Harris v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1863