Legal Opinion
Young v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 19, 1991No. 91-1650PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
585 So.2d 1184 (1991)
Rufus YOUNG, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1650.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 19, 1991.
Rufus Young, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PETERSON, Judge.
Rufus Young appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the denial without prejudice to Young to resubmit his motion to the trial court.
Our affirmance is based upon two grounds:
1. Young's motion failed to meet the requirements of rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that it be made under oath and that it state whether there was an appeal from his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Deese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Roseman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schofield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Raines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Van Tassell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Antoine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Truesdale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.