Oilbelt Motor Co. v. Hinton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLeslie, J.
The plaintiff, Luke Hinton, exchanged his promissory note in the sum of 8500 and a secondhand Chevrolet car valued at $395, to the defendant, Oilbelt Motor Company, for a secondhand Studebaker car valued at $895. The condition of the Studebaker and its performance not being .up to a 30-day guaranty, as alleged by the plaintiff, he returned the same to defendant. Later he filed this suit for $395, the trade-in value of the Chevrolet. Trial before the court and jury resulted in a verdict favorable to the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. RoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Northern Texas Traction Co. v. WoodallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Robinson v. Ætna Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Thompson v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Vincent v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.