Legal Opinion

Oilbelt Motor Co. v. Hinton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1928No. 501PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeslie, J.

The plaintiff, Luke Hinton, exchanged his promissory note in the sum of 8500 and a secondhand Chevrolet car valued at $395, to the defendant, Oilbelt Motor Company, for a secondhand Studebaker car valued at $895. The condition of the Studebaker and its performance not being .up to a 30-day guaranty, as alleged by the plaintiff, he returned the same to defendant. Later he filed this suit for $395, the trade-in value of the Chevrolet. Trial before the court and jury resulted in a verdict favorable to the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. RoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. WoodallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Robinson v. Ætna Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Thompson v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Vincent v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API