Legal Opinion

Russell v. Bald Eagle Mining Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1934No. Civil No. 3438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

T. Fred Russell, hereinafter called petitioner, on the 22d of April 1929, while in the employ of the Bald Eagle Mining Company, received certain injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. These injuries, so far as could be determined by the physicians of the Industrial Commission at the time, consisted of a separation of the symphisis pubis, with contusions of the perineum and some infiltration into the tissues surrounding the pelvic regions. Petitioner was about the age of 53 at the time of the accident, and was a very large and heavy man. Due to these facts, the physicians…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zagar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. London v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Nitkey v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Radaca v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lockhart v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Jupin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API