Beaulieu v. Parsons
Supreme Court of Minnesota
APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE HENNEPIN COUNTY. The issues arising in this Court, were presented by the Bill of Exceptions, containing the proceedings had at the trial, and the evidence of the several witnesses examined. Sufficient reference to the Bill of Exceptions is made in the opinion filed, to explain the points decided.
Read the full summary
APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE HENNEPIN COUNTY. The issues arising in this Court, were presented by the Bill of Exceptions, containing the proceedings had at the trial, and the evidence of the several witnesses examined. Sufficient reference to the Bill of Exceptions is made in the opinion filed, to explain the points decided. The following were the points and authorities of the Appellant’s Counsel: The Court below erred in refusing the motion for a new trial in this cause._ Fi/rst. Because the verdict was contrary to the law, and the evidence offered to the jury. Second. Because the Court…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Atwater, J.
This is an appeal from an *41order of the Judge of the Second Judicial District, refusing a new trial, in a cause tried in that District, at the December term, 1857. The first ground of error alleged, is the refusal of the Court to receive on the part of the Defendant, the testimony of one Ambs, whom the Defendant proposed to examine on the trial of the cause.
This witness was examined on the part of the Plaintiff, Parsons, who asked him the price of muskrat skins, (being a part of the furs in dispute,) but inquired no further of this witness in regard to the value of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Barnette v. HicksTexas Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. KubySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Caldwell v. BruggermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- State v. CollinsNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1894