Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rassner v. R. H. Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1967Published

1Dissent

McNally, J. (dissenting).

In this foreclosure action the sole issue is whether plaintiffs are estopped from establishing the undisputed balance due on the mortgage sought to be foreclosed. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment has been denied.

The mortgage note, dated August 1, 1956, is in the sum of $111,000. It is secured by a second mortgage on three parcels of real property within New York County. The unpaid balance is $28,125, with interest from May 1, 1966.

The second mortgage, which is the mortgage involved, is a purchase money mortgage. It was executed in behalf of Misnan Corp., the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Payne v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Keller v. Quad Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API