Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hoerich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 3, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Catherine Hughes and the trustee named in the trust-deed filed a bill to foreclose the trust deed which was given to secure an indebtedness. The evidence was taken before the master and a decree entered by the chancellor finding that there was due the complainant $13,111.02, and decreeing that it be paid by some of the defendants within three days, or the property conveyed by the trust deed be sold by the master, and out of the proceeds thereof pay the complainant, and if there was a deficiency, to report the same to the court. It is the ordinary foreclosure decree. The decree further found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirby v. RunalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bouton v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cotes v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gochenour v. MowryIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Karnes v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metrobank v. CannatelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Clifford v. LevinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Metrobank v. CANNATELLOAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API